MarkAny

MarkAny is a Korean rights management company, which has licensed Digimarc’s audio watermarking patents for combating music piracy. The most likely source is the software supplied with a Samsung MP3 player. Your PC will probably be running MAAgent.exe from C:Program FilesMarkAnyContentSafer (if it’s in a different folder, a file of the same name could be malware). You don’t need it.

It is almost certainly part of your samsung mobile phone driver package and intended to stop pirated music being downloaded by or played through the mobile phone.It came along with http://www.samsung.com/uk/support/mo…OFTWARE.MANUAL

it appears to be needed for you to use the samsung store and also does something when you conver videos to play on the mobile phone

You have 2 choices:
leave it alone or uninstall everything samsung related & don’t use of buy their products

Email clients

04-Apr-2012

POP3 vs IMAP – A Beginners Guide

Should you use POP3 or IMAP? It’s question we’re often asked here at Domainmonster.com, so lets discuss the two protocols and the advantages of each.

The first thing you need to do before making a decision is to understand what POP3 and IMAP are and of course the difference between the two.

What are they?

Both POP3 and IMAP are protocols that email services use to receive email, be it to an email client such as Outlook or a mobile device.

POP3 – Post Office Protocol 3 is a protocol that has been around for decades. It’s the standard way that a mail service will receive email from a mail server.

IMAP – Internet Message Access Protocol is a protocol that is much newer then POP3 and is used by mail products to view your mail as opposed to actually downloading it.

What is the difference to me?

If you decide to configure your email client or mobile device to connect to your mailbox using POP3 then what happens is that the client or device contacts the mailbox and allows them to download the contents of the Inbox to their own local storage. The mail then will only exist on that local storage and would not be available to download via another client or device. It is however worth noting at this point that a number of clients and devices do allow you to enable a setting to ‘keep a copy of the email on the server’ this would then allow them to be download via a second client if required.

When using IMAP with a client or device they will simply connect to the mailbox and display the full mailbox to you without actually downloading the content to local storage. This has the benefit of allowing you to manage your mailbox from multiple clients and devices and seeing the same content.

If you think about your mailbox as a post-box full of letters, and your mail clients and devices as postmen it can become a little easier to understand the basic fundamental differences between the two protocols.

When using POP3 a postman would visit the post-box and empty the contents and take it away with him. If a second postman then arrived he would only have access to the letters that had been placed into the post-box since the first visit.

When using IMAP a postman would visit the post-box and take a copy of the letters and take those copies away with him, then when a second postman arrived he would do the same and still be able to see all of the letters placed into the post-box.

Which one should I use?

Which protocol you decide to use depends mainly on how you will be accessing and managing your email. If you are likely to be viewing your mail from multiple locations, clients or devices then It is usually best to use IMAP. IMAP will allow you to manage your mailbox from all of these different locations and clients while the actual mailbox content remains on the provider’s mail server. If you were to do the same using POP3 with the ‘Keep a copy on the server’ setting enabled then you are in essence simply creating multiple copies of your mailbox and any management of the mail into sub folders would need to be repeated on each individual client.

If you are simply going to be using one email client and do not want to worry about reaching the mailbox size limit, due to the amount of email, then POP3 would be the way to go. This provides a simple service to allow you to download all of your mail to one location managed by you. The mailbox on the provider’s server would always be empty or close to it as a result and so you would never need to worry about reaching the limit.

ConclusionIf in doubt use IMAP, this gives you the ability to manage your mail from a client or device while still giving the peace of mind that there is a backup, on the mail provider’s server, of your mail. However if you are only accessing your mail from one place and need to keep all your mail locally, POP3 may be a better option.

Google Input Tools

Published on Apr 3, 2013

Input Tools in Gmail: http://youtu.be/UvhD-oZcGOA
Input Tools in Drive: http://youtu.be/pARKdhmY1zA
Input Tools Chrome extension: http://youtu.be/wwODzmWHX8s
How to use transliteration: http://youtu.be/jtoRNSR93_w

Published on Apr 3, 2013

Install: http://goo.gl/mYMB5
Input Tools in Gmail: http://youtu.be/UvhD-oZcGOA
Input Tools in Drive: http://youtu.be/pARKdhmY1zA
How to use transliteration: http://youtu.be/jtoRNSR93_w
How to use virtual keyboard: http://youtu.be/1k_6Pc4GzKQ

Forex Trading Systems

Forex Trendy – Best Trend Scanner

Forex X Code

Winning Trade System

Binary Options Trading Signals

Million Dollar Pips: The First Million Dollar Forex Robot With Real Results

Fxpro System – High Profitable Forex Trading system

Option Bot

Binary Power Bot

Forex Signals & Mentoring | About Vladimir’s Forex Signals & Mentoring Club

The FX-Agency Advisor 3

Traders Elite – Forex Signals, Strategies & Trade Copying

Set And Forget Forex Signals

Forex Candlesticks Made Easy

Pipjet

Simple Forex Tester

ABS – AutoBinarySignals.com

Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS)

In the United States, Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) is a Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) term defining a non-developmental item (NDI) of supply that is both commercial and sold in substantial quantities in the commercial marketplace, and that can be procured or utilized under government contract in the same precise form as available to the general public. For example, technology related items, such as computer software, hardware systems or free software with commercial support, and construction materials qualify, but bulk cargo, such as agricultural or petroleum products, do not.

COTS purchases are alternatives to in-house developments or one-off government-funded developments. COTS typically requires configuration that is tailored for specific uses. The use of COTS has been mandated across many government and business programs, as such products may offer significant savings in procurement, development, and maintenance.

Contents

Oracle releases Java EE 7 with eye on HTML5 development

Oracle has announced the availability of Java Platform Enterprise Edition 7, a release that brings new capabilities for HTML5-based application development to the framework.

Oracle has announced the availability of Java Platform Enterprise Edition 7, a release that brings new capabilities for HTML5-based application development to the framework.

Symantec told a hacker group that it would pay $50,000

As part of a sting operation, Symantec told a hacker group that it would pay $50,000 to keep the source code for some of the its flagship security products off the Internet, the company confirmed to CNET this evening.

An e-mail exchange revealing the extortion attempt posted to Pastebin (see below) today shows a purported Symantec employee named Sam Thomas negotiating payment with an individual named “Yamatough” to prevent the release of PCAnywhere and Norton Antivirus code. Yamatough is the Twitter identity of an individual or group that had previously threatened to release the source code for Norton Antivirus.

“We will pay you $50,000.00 USD total,” Thomas said in an e-mail dated last Thursday. “However, we need assurances that you are not going to release the code after payment. We will pay you $2,500 a month for the first three months. Payments start next week. After the first three months you have to convince us you have destroyed the code before we pay the balance. We are trusting you to keep your end of the bargain.”
A Symantec representative confirmed for CNET the extortion attempt in this statement:

In January an individual claiming to be part of the ‘Anonymous’ group attempted to extort a payment from Symantec in exchange for not publicly posting stolen Symantec source code they claimed to have in their possession. Symantec conducted an internal investigation into this incident and also contacted law enforcement given the attempted extortion and apparent theft of intellectual property. The communications with the person(s) attempting to extort the payment from Symantec were part of the law enforcement investigation. Given that the investigation is still ongoing, we are not going to disclose the law enforcement agencies involved and have no additional information to provide.

However, after weeks of discussions regarding proof of code and how to transfer payment, talks broke down and the deal was never completed. A group called AnonymousIRC tweeted this evening that it would soon release the data. “#Symantec software source codes to be released soon. stay tuned folks!!! #Anonymous #AntiSec #CockCrashed #NortonAV.”
Apparently after weeks of discussions, Yamatough’s patience was wearing thin, leading to an ultimatum:

“If we dont hear from you in 30m we make an official announcement and put your code on sale at auction terms. We have many people who are willing to get your code. Dont f*** with us.”

The exchange gets contentious at times, with Yamatough suggesting that Symantec was trying to track the source of the e-mails:

“If you are trying to trace with the ftp trick it’s just worthless. If we detect any malevolent tracing action we cancel the deal. Is that clear? You’ve got the doc files and pathes [sic] to the files. what’s the problem? Explain.”

Another e-mail, with the subject line “say hi to FBI,” accuses the company of being in contact with the federal law enforcement agency, a charge Thomas denied. “We are not in contact with the FBI,” he wrote, falsely. “We are using this email account to protect our network from you. Protecting our company and property are our top priorities.”
Yamatough demanded that Symantec transfer the money via Liberty Reserve, a payment processor based in San Jose, Costa Rica. But Thomas appears reluctant, calling it “more complicated than we expected.” Thomas instead suggests using PayPal to transmit a $1,000 test as “a sign of good faith.” Yamatough rejects that offer, saying, “Do not send us any money (we do not use paypal period) do not send us any 1k etc. We can wait till we agree on final amount.”
Liberty Reserve did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The posted thread ends with an exchange today with the subject line “10 minutes” that threatens to release the code immediately if Symantec doesn’t agree to use the payment processor to transfer the funds:

“Since no code yet being released and our email communication wasnt also released we give you 10 minutes to decide which way you go after that two of your codes fly to the moon PCAnywhere and Norton Antivirus totaling 2350MB in size (rar) 10 minutes if no reply from you we consider it a START this time we’ve made mirrors so it will be hard for you to get rid of it.”

Thomas’ response, apparently the last of the discussion, is brief: “We can’t make a decision in ten minutes. We need more time.”
Symantec admitted in mid-January that a 2006 security breach of its networks led to the theft of the source code, backtracking on earlier statements that its network had not been hacked. The security software maker initially said a third party was responsible for allowing the theft of 2006-era source code for Norton Antivirus Corporate Edition, Norton Internet Security, Norton SystemWorks (Norton Utilities and Norton GoBack), and PCAnywhere.

Symantec said that most of it customers were not in any increased danger of cyberattacks as a result of the code’s theft but that users of its remote-access suite PCAnywhere may face a “slightly increased security risk.”
Symantec instructed its PCAnywhere users in late January to disable the product until the company could issue a software update to protect them against attacks that could result from the theft of the product’s source code.
The theft came to light in early January when hackers claimed that they had accessed the source code for certain Symantec products, which Symantec identified as Symantec Endpoint Protection (SEP) 11.0 and Symantec Antivirus 10.2. Evidence at the time suggested that hackers found the code after breaking into servers run by Indian military intelligence.
A hacker group calling itself Yama Tough and employing the mask of hacktivist group Anonymous in its Twitter avatar said in a tweet last month that it would release 1.7GB of source code for Norton Antivirus, but the group said in a later tweet that that it had decided to delay the release.

Update at 9:15 p.m.: A 1.2GB file labeled “Symantec’s pcAnywhere Leaked Source Code” has been posted to The Pirate Bay. CNET has asked Symantec whether the code is authentic. The story will be updated when Symantec responds.